Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Beware Of Tyranny

Monday, June 21st, 2010

While it appears that Americans are waking up to the nightmare of Obama’s leftward tilt is it a dollar short and a day late? You decide after reading the latest commentary from conservative Thomas Sowell.Click Full Story.

The World Unimpressed By Obama

Saturday, June 19th, 2010

It looks like the consensus of world governments is that President Obama is not ready for prime time. The fact is that he never really was qualified in the first place. He has style but no substance. An empty suit if there ever was one. He got by on his charisma and impressive voice and rode war fatigue coupled with the declining economy in October. Now the emperor has no clothes on.Click Full Story.

The NRA Actually Opposes The “Disclose Act”

Saturday, June 19th, 2010

The following commentaries should allay any fears that the NRA supports the “Disclose Act” and refute the misinformation, confusion, and in some cases outright lies about its true position.

NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS ALERT
Vol. 17, No. 24 06/18/10
Statement From NRA-ILA Executive Director
Chris W. Cox On H.R. 5175, The “DISCLOSE Act”

I appreciate the concerns that some NRA members have raised regarding our position on H.R. 5175, the “DISCLOSE Act.” Regrettably, our position has been misstated by some and intentionally misrepresented by others. I hope you’ll allow me to provide the proper context.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision was a significant victory for free speech and the Constitution. The NRA filed a strong brief in that case, which the Court specifically cited several times in its opinion. The DISCLOSE Act is an attempt to reverse that victory and that’s why we told Congress we oppose it.

The NRA has never supported — nor would we ever support — any version of this bill. Those who suggest otherwise are wrong.

The restrictions in this bill should not apply to anyone or to any organization. My job is to ensure they don’t apply to the NRA and our members. Without the NRA, the Second Amendment will be lost and I will do everything in my power to prevent that.

We believe that any restriction on political speech is repugnant. But some of our critics believe we should put the Second Amendment at risk over a First Amendment principle to protect other organizations. That’s easy to say — unless you have a sworn duty to protect the Second Amendment above all else, as I do.

The NRA is a single-issue organization made up of millions of individual members dedicated to protecting the Second Amendment. We do not represent the interests of other organizations. Nor do all groups fight all issues together. For example, we didn’t support the U.S. Chamber of Commerce when it backed amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens and we did not join the Chamber in its support of President Obama’s stimulus bill. And we’ve been in direct opposition when the Chamber has tried to restrict Second Amendment rights in publicly accessible parking lots.

Rather than focusing on opposing this bill, some have encouraged people to blame the NRA for this Congress’s unconstitutional attack on free speech. That’s a shame. If you oppose this bill, I hope you will contact your Member of Congress and Senators so they can hear from you.

Statement From David Keene, NRA First
Vice-President On H.R. 5175, The “DISCLOSE Act”

I have been an NRA Board member for some years and currently serve as NRA’s First Vice-President — that you may know. What you may not know is that I have been in the forefront of the fight against liberal attempts to tilt the political playing field their way for decades through what they like to call campaign finance reform. This is a battle that began in the seventies when I put together the case that went to the United States Supreme Court known as Buckley v. Valeo. I was a vocal opponent of the so-called McCain-Feingold “reforms” that shackled groups like the NRA in recent years, and I have served as a First Amendment Fellow at Vanderbilt University’s Freedom Forum.

I can assure you that I would never countenance a “deal” of the sort you think the NRA made with Congress to further Democratic attempts to restrict political speech. I consider such restrictions to be not only repugnant, but blatantly unconstitutional, an opinion shared by NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre and Institute for Legislative Action Executive Director Chris Cox.

The so-called “DISCLOSE ACT” is a horrible piece of legislation designed to do exactly what you suggest. It would require advocacy groups to run a regulatory gauntlet designed to make it very difficult for many of them to play the role for which they were formed and is both bad policy and flies in the face of recent Supreme Court decisions.

But I’m afraid there’s more . particularly how it would affect the NRA. When you think of the NRA you no doubt think mostly about the NRA’s advocacy on Second Amendment issues, but the NRA also provides training to its members, law enforcement and military personnel, works with states, counties and private organizations to build ranges and runs competitive events such as those at Camp Perry in Ohio. Since Camp Perry is a military base, public monies go into range development and federal funds go to training military and police personnel, the NRA would be classed with government contractors and TARP recipients under the DISCLOSE ACT as originally written and effectively prohibited from engaging in any meaningful political activity.

In other words, this act as originally written by anti-gun legislators like New York Senator Chuck Schumer would have silenced the NRA .which would have been the death knell for the Second Amendment.

NRA has one major mission . to defend the right of its members and all Americans to Keep & Bear Arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment. Therefore, the NRA served notice on Congress that since the act threatened our very existence, we were prepared to do anything and everything that might be required to defeat it unless it was changed so that we could continue to represent the views of our members in the public arena. The letter, sent on May 26, was public. The NRA did not engage in back room shenanigans, but told Congressional leaders quite clearly that we would do whatever we needed to do to protect the rights of our members and our ability to defend the Second Amendment.

Last week Democratic leadership in the House capitulated by agreeing to exempt the NRA from the act — not in return for NRA support, but to avoid a political war that might cost them even more seats this fall.

I have to tell you that I never thought the Democrats would agree to this — not because they have much regard for constitutional rights — because I didn’t believe their left wing would allow it. The events since their capitulation convince me that their fear of NRA retaliation forced them to take steps that split their coalition and could easily doom the whole bill.

Consider this: on Thursday night, California Senator Diane Feinstein, one of the most anti-Second Amendment members of the Senate, announced that she wouldn’t support the DISCLOSE ACT if it exempted the NRA. By Friday some two-dozen left wing activist groups that had previously been pressing Congress to pass the bill announced that now they wanted it defeated.

The bottom line is that in refusing to risk its members’ rights and the very survival of the Second Amendment, the NRA has also made it less rather than more likely that support for this terrible legislation will collapse and the free speech rights of every one of us will benefit.

Setting The Record Straight On The “DISCLOSE Act”
We appreciate the concerns some NRA members have raised about our position on H.R. 5175, the “DISCLOSE Act.” Unfortunately, the mainstream media and other critics of NRA’s role in this process have misstated or misunderstood the facts. We’d like to set the record straight.

We have never said we would support any version of this bill. To the contrary, we clearly stated NRA’s strong opposition to the DISCLOSE Act (as introduced) in a letter sent to Members of Congress on May 26 (click here to read the letter).

Through the courts and in Congress, the NRA has consistently and strongly opposed any effort to restrict the rights of our four million members to speak and have their voices heard on behalf of gun owners nationwide. The initial version of H.R. 5175 would effectively have put a gag order on the NRA during elections and threatened our members’ right to privacy and freedom of association, by forcing us to turn our donor lists over to the federal government. We would also have been forced to list our top donors on all election-related television, radio and Internet ads and mailings — even mailings to our own members. We refuse to let this Congress impose those unconstitutional restrictions on our Association.

The introduced version of the bill would also have prohibited political speech by all federal government contractors. The NRA has contracts to provide critical firearm training for our Armed Forces and law enforcement agencies throughout the country. The bill would have forced us to choose between training our men and women in uniform and exercising our right to free political speech. We refused to let this Congress force us to make that choice.

We told Congress we opposed the bill. Consequently, congressional leaders announced they would exempt us from its draconian restrictions on political speech. If that happens, we will not be involved in final consideration of this bill in the House. If it doesn’t, we will strongly oppose the bill.

Our position is based on principle and experience. During consideration of the previous campaign finance legislation passed in 2002, congressional leadership repeatedly refused to exempt the NRA from its provisions, promising that our concerns would be fixed somewhere down the line. That didn’t happen; instead, the NRA had to live under those restrictions for seven years and spend millions of dollars on compliance costs and on legal fees to challenge the law. We will not go down that road again when we have an opportunity to protect our ability to speak.

There are those who say the NRA should put the Second Amendment at risk over a First Amendment principle. That’s easy to say — unless you have a sworn duty to protect the Second Amendment above all else, as we do.

The NRA is a non-partisan, single-issue organization made up of millions of individual members dedicated to the protection of the Second Amendment. We do not represent the interests of other organizations. That’s their responsibility. Our responsibility is to protect and defend the interests of our members. And that we do without apology.

Today, the fate of the bill remains in doubt. The House floor debate has repeatedly been postponed. Lawmakers and outside groups who once supported the bill, or took no position — including the Brady Campaign — have now come out against it because of the announcement regarding NRA. The outcome in the Senate is even murkier, as anti-gun Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) has announced her strong opposition to the proposed change.

No matter what may happen now, NRA members can be assured that protection of gun owners’ interests will remain NRA’s top priority. Please check in regularly at www.NRAILA.org for the latest news on this issue.

Obama Posturing For The Hispanic Vote

Saturday, June 19th, 2010

The Obama regime is poised to sue the state of Arizona for the passage of its new and tough anti-illegal alien law. The goal is to ensure the Hispanic vote for the Democrats this upcoming November. Obama is well aware that he is not likely to prevail in court simply because the law mirrors federal law already on the books. Unless of course the case goes before a few liberal activist judges who tend to legislate from the bench. Be that as it may even if he wins in court his regime is again going against the will of the people as the latest polls reveal he has lost independent voters who largely voted for him in 2008 and are now disenchented due to his extreme leftist leanings. This transparent move is calculated to impress Latino voters. But his con game is wearing thin.Click Full Story.

Why Is Obama Soft On Terrorism?

Friday, June 11th, 2010

There is a growing suspicion among Obama critics that maybe he is actually a stealth Muslim. Did he not say during an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopolous, “My Muslim faith?” And we do notice his kneejerk reaction to condemn Israel for it’s alleged atrocities while holding his fire against Hamas and other terrorist groups. Even former New York City Mayor Koch has opined recently that Obama is pro-Arab and anti-Israel. How can the president or anyone deny this? Isn’t it obvious?Click Full Story.

Health Care Lie Exposed

Friday, June 11th, 2010

Now we see a report that employers are very likely to opt out of providing healthcare to their employess and paying the fines instead which in the end would drive workers into the government’s socialized medicine plan as predicted by critics in the first place.Click Full Story.

My People Perish For Lack Of Knowledge

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

Ignorance of the enemies tactics and tricks is the surest way for a civilization or nation to be destroyed. The world apparently hasn’t learned its lesson from Neville Chamberlain namely that negotiating with and bowing to an aggressor’s demands creates the appearance of weakness and invites additional attacks. The idea of Muslims building a mosque near ground zero in lower Manhattan is an outrage. Would the liberals approve a pro-life building to be constructed right across the street from an abortion clinic bombed by anti-abortion terrorists? Building the mosque [near the site of the Twin Towers] is akin to planting a flag on conquered enemy territory. Erik Rush weighs in brilliantly on this disturbing subject.Click Full Story.

Immaturity, Naivete’, And Delusions Of Grandeur

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

At one time when Obama faced the Republicans shortly after his victory he was flabbergasted that they refused to agree with his vision for and steadfastly opposed his agenda. His response was, “I won!” My visceral response was, “How childish. Welcome to the real world of politics in Washington. What makes you think that the opposition is going to roll over for you? It doesn’t work that way, President Obama.”

Now Mr. Obama is feeling more angst over the fact that the mainstream media is no longer fawning over him and giving him a free pass. They are beginning to ask tough questions they heretofore ignored out of deference to a fellow standard bearer and liberal president. The gloves are now coming off. Click Full Story.

Remembering D-Day

Monday, June 7th, 2010

As a baby boomer I remember watching the World War II movie classic “The Longest Day” [about the 1944 allied invasion of German occupied France] during my teenage years. I never tired of reruns, either. An annual commemoration is held in Normandy [on June 6] and attended by dignataries and surviving veterans of this epic battle that turned the tide against the German gauntlet. Read with pride the moving eulogy, if you will, about this great historical moment.Click Full Story.

What Peace Flotilla?

Friday, June 4th, 2010

As expected the Ministry of Propanda omitted to mention that two groups associated with the so-called “Peace Flotilla” are known terrorists supporters. A very insightful email was sent to me from the Traditional Values Coalition with links that expose the truth about the real motives of the flotilla enroute to Gaza. Note: See YouTube “We Con The World”

President Obama’s Marxist “Humanitarians”
Help Provoke Attack On Israeli Forces

June 4, 2010 — CNN, MSNBC and the rest of the media have spent a lot of wattage on the “peace flotilla” which claimed to be bringing aid to people in Gaza over the objections of Israel. Israel had stopped, at least, two ships earlier this year carrying guns and missiles to Gaza and their insistence that all ships should be inspected and searched was very reasonable.

The multi-talented Caroline Glick produced a music video “We Con the World!” on all of the lies and distortions involved in the “humanitarian” flotilla to Gaza coupled with the Israel Defense Force (IDF) footage of the terrorist peaceniks gathering weapons to use against the Israeli boarding party.

Benjamin Netanyahu and the people of Israel need to be supported by our voices and by our prayers for the brave stand they have taken in defense of free and civilized people everywhere. Israel is surrounded by terrorists yet the rest of the world, including our own “transparent” President Obama, just watches.

Anthony TAKE ACTION: Contact your U.S. Representative and two U.S. Senators and ask that they strongly support the efforts by Israel to protect themselves from Islamic terrorist activity in the Gaza Strip.
Prime Minister Netanyahu is the leader of the free world while Barack Obama is trying to decide between golf or Gulf — another round of golf or going down to the Gulf to get photographed with more oil-covered sea gulls. Obama is morphing into bumbling Jimmy Carter every hour of every day while Netanyahu is leading and taking on the stature of Reagan and Churchill.

God bless and protect Israel and God help America during this bleak and uncertain hour.

Few reports have focused on the two organizations involved in the flotilla. They are the IHH (Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief [Insani Yardim Vakfi]), billed as a “charity” group from Turkey and Free Gaza, an organization of leftist radicals who wish to foment violence against Israel.

The IHH is a front group with a history of supplying weapons to Islamic terrorist groups in the region. Even the French recognize this group as a front for terrorists.

Free Gaza was founded in 2008 to agitate for Islamists in the Gaza Strip. Involved in the founding of this were former Weather Underground domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dorhn, and Jodie Evans, a founder of Code Pink , an anti-military and anti-American organization. Code Pink routinely pickets military recruitment centers, barges into congressional hearings, and does whatever it can to subvert our efforts against Islamic terrorism around the world.

President Obama began his political career in the living room of Ayers and Dohrn . Ayers had been involved in the bombing of the Pentagon and a New York City police department in the 1970s during the Vietnam War. Both had gone underground for years to avoid capture for their terrorist activities.

Anthony TAKE ACTION: Contact your U.S. Representative and two U.S. Senators and ask that they strongly support the efforts by Israel to protect themselves from Islamic terrorist activity in the Gaza Strip. Every nation has the inherent right to protect itself from invasion or attack by enemies.

EMAIL THIS TO A FRIEND