Last year in Afghanistan when the military burned bibles earmarked for distribution to Muslims there was no media outrage or widespread coverage. Yet now that a Florida minister is planning to burn Korans the powers-that-be have – like cockroaches -come out of the woodwork to denounce this Christian. We in the West are bending over backwards to pacify Muslims at the expense of our Judeo-Christian faith. Though I do not approve of burning Korans it IS a right protected by our Bill of Rights.Click Full Story.

Judeo-Christian history has resoundingly touted the “sanctity of life” as a major tenet and value to be defended. Therefore, abortion was always looked upon as a horrible evil act of callous murder against a forming human being in the womb. The word “fetus” is used to de-humanize the child in the womb by the abortion industry. But key verses cited by pro-life groups as a proof text are Luke 1: 39-41. These verses allude to pregnant Elizabeth as carrying an infant or baby. How many pro-choice supporters have actually seen an abortion or would like to see one? Most likely very few. Seeing aborted babies would change many minds. The following linked story would cause any pro-choice advocates to re-think their position.Click Full Story

I had knee surgery and will not be able to blog for about another 2 weeks. But I’ll be back in a jiffy. Semper Fidelis!

The following story was not reported in the US press. Why? Because the media is actually the new Ministry of Propaganda [remember George Orwell?] that is a willing apologist and accomplice for the Democrats and their anti-American socialist agenda. Remeber that perception is reality in politics. Mr. Obama, nevertheles, has done nothing to assuage the suspicion that he is a Muslim with his tilt toward the Muslims and his obvious disdain for Christianity. Sometimes you can find the truth from overseas. Like Europe, for example.Click Full Story.

That socialized medicine always leads to rationed care is borne out when you analyze Britain and Canada in particular. With the government in charge of medical decisions such as the dispensing of medications and certain lab tests and use of medical equipment and surgical procedures the outcome has been to ration all of the above. Sometimes life extending drugs are disallowed because the government deems it too costly and imprudent. That former South Dakota Senator Tom Daschle (D) extolled the wisdom of the European’s reluctance to treat the elderly like any other “younger” patients speaks volumes. Add to the mix when Ezekiel Emanuel, MD [brother of Rahm Emanuel] opined that some physicians took the Hippocratic Oath “too seriously” how can any clear thinking and honest person not assume that death panels will become part and parcel of ObamaCare?Click Full Story.

Finally, a voice of reason from the world of Islam. This particular Muslim has lent credence to other moderate Muslims who are decrying the construction of the Ground Zero mosque as extremely insensitive. See story.Click Full Story.

Once again a Marine friend of mine who served in Vietnam with me has passed on some heretofore unknown information [to most Americans] about the behind-the-scenes players in the Ground Zero mosque controversy.

Tony,

There’s still a lot more information to be found, I’m sure.

This Financial Times (of London) article about the project contains one of the references I’ve seen to an original plan for condos:

Meanwhile, Gamal’s Soho Properties was in the process of acquiring – for $4.85m – a five-story building on Park Place, three blocks from the trade towers site. The building had housed a Burlington Coat Factory warehouse until it was abandoned after the landing gear of one of the hijacked aircraft tore through its roof. Initially, Gamal had planned to build a condominium complex at the site, but was convinced by Rauf’s idea for a cultural centre with a prayer space, especially as the Muslim community
in New York had been growing for some time.

If you have time to read the entire article, it has an interesting point of view. It was written by and for “outsiders” (Europeans) who aren’t part of our political process.

There is a Wikipedia article that summarizes the Cordoba Project and another about Soho Properties. It’s probably best to be careful about Wikipedia articles on controversial issues, but these looked fairly neutral at first glance.

There’s been a fair amount of screaming recently in the news about a “refusal to reveal the sources of their funding for the project.” I don’t think that means they are hiding something shady. I think it means they haven’t got the 100 million yet.

I think the business owners, property owners and residents of Lower Manhattan are the only ones to decide whether this project should be built. Not Glen Beck, Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich or Barack Obama. It’s not up to the people of New York City or Los Angeles how we run things here in Olean, NY either.

If it was up to me then I’d say: Hey, let’s raise $100 million, buy the property and put up a true multi-cultural peace center. We can have a Christian chapel, a Synagogue, a Mosque and a little barn out back for the Amish to stable their horses. Soho Properties can donate the real estate and get a plaque with their name on it. Obama can pledge some of that economic recovery money.

Should I send my idea to Mayor Bloomberg?

Have a great day!

Jim

Note to readers: Google The Financial Times of London Cordoba Project Article

Now that the US Supreme Court has upheld the Second Amendment as an individual right, and not a collective right, the City of Chicago has embarked upon another “clever” but transparent gun prohibitionist campaign. It is now required of handgun applicants to attend one hour gun familiarization classes. The problem is that because local gun ranges are going to be shut down the applicant must travel outside of city limits to attend the classes. This is done deliberately by Mayor Daly to discourage gun ownership by making the process a cumbersome and annoying one. Having anticipated the mayor’s move the gun lobby is now suing the City of Chicago.Click Full Story.

Do you feel the anger about President Obama’s support of a mosque being constructed in downtown Manhattan near Ground Zero? Shall we call it arrogance, tone deaf, insensitive? It’s immaterial. Most people consider it caving in to Muslim’s with an anti-Western civilization agenda. As I said before the building of this mosque is tantamount to planting a flag on conquered enemy territory. The people will be heard loud and clear in November.Click Full Story.

Are you really surprised that President Obama finally spoke out in favor of allowing a mosque to be built near Ground Zero? According to him it’s a freedom of religion issue. That’s the typical propaganda line from liberals. That the insistence to build the mosque is actually pouring salt into the wounds of surviving family members of the victims of 9-11 seemed not to move the president one iota. In his arrogance he is also galvanizing American voters to come out in droves this November to make a statement and to get our country back.