If you have any liberal friends or relatives who recite the mantra that the world is indeed warming then take a gander at this report/video clip. The last few days have been devestating for the global warming junk scientists and their allies. Now they must defend against colleagues who insist that global cooling – not warming – is actually happeninFull Story.Click Full Story.

More and more damaging evidence is surfacing about the attempt to dupe the masses into embracing global warming as a scientific fact. This is typical of the liberals to lie with statistics and to use junk science.Click Full Story.

Go to: http://reason.com/archives/2009/11/11/the-folly-of-unilateral-disarm

And: Click here.

It is absolutely true that when engaged in the free exchange of ideas liberals realize that research and other data does not support their arguments. Therefore, their modus operandi is to lie lie lie and/or to use emotion and play on people’s fears. Take the gun control debate, for example. For the last 30 years they have lied with statistics and finally the Gun Lobby has won every major debate with roughly 75% of the people opposing gun control. Switching gears we now find the same deceptive pattern with regard to global warming. The intellectual data does not support it whatsover. The liberals have been caught and the mainstream media (a.k.a. the Ministry of Propaganda) is attempting to sweep it under the rug. But it’s too late.Click here.

I always doubted global warming was true. Taking the word of scientists as the gospel truth was never a sentiment that I shared. Why? Because the Ice Age did not come. Nor did masses of people die from air polution or over population. Nor from massive earthquakes in the 1980s, either as predicted by scientists. This massive international hoax was recently exposed with the revelation of British scientists being caught trying to destroy emails detailing how to trick the public about global warming. Now we have proof that it was always a hoax.Click Full Story.

It’s not over yet even though pro-gun advocates won a major victory last June, 2008 with the Heller Decision when the US Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional Washington, DC’s ban on the private ownership of firearms. See full story below.

Bloomfield Press files amicus brief
in Chicago gun-ban case

Bill of Rights at serious risk in Supreme Court case

[Don’t forget Bill Of Rights Day, Dec. 15, 2009 at the Wrigley Mansion
[RSVP now or miss out: bor-day@gunlaws.com?subject=BOR-RSVP

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact Felicity Bower, 602-996-4020

Nov. 24, 2009

Should individual states be required to honor your guarantees under the Bill of Rights? Phoenix-based Bloomfield Press has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to say yes, in an amicus (“friend of the court”) brief just filed.

The goal is to require states to be bound by the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. They are not currently obligated to do so. This principle is up for review in McDonald v. Chicago, expected to be argued at the High Court in February, 2010, and decided by June. See the filing here — http://www.gunlaws.com/supreme.htm

The Bill of Rights was adopted in 1791 only to control Congress (e.g., “Congress shall make no law…”), and the High Court has only applied the Bill to the states in bits and pieces. Studies have shown most people are unaware of this.

The 14th Amendment in 1868 said states cannot abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens, or deprive or deny the rights of the people, but it provided few details — and the High Court has been evaluating that since then.

Working piecemeal, the Court has declared states cannot deny free speech, protection against unreasonable searches, the right to counsel in a criminal trial and more. This principle is now on trial in what may be the highest-profile case of its kind — the right to arms in the Second Amendment.

Chicago has flatly banned this right, leaving its citizens defenseless, and insists it has the power to do so. The city’s ban does little to disarm hardened criminals who simply roam free, carrying guns illegally at will.

“The core issue is whether a state has legitimate power to deny any fundamental right to its people,” says Alan Korwin, author of eight books on gun law and the publisher at Bloomfield Press, the nation’s largest producer and distributor of gun-law books. “This issue is so broad and crucial to America that pro-rights and even anti-rights people on the gun issue are aligned to overturn Chicago’s blanket denial of a fundamental right,” he says.

The avowedly anti-gun-rights Washington Post observed that, “Lawyers from both the left and right of the political spectrum will present strong arguments that the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments.”

That sentiment was echoed in the similarly anti-rights LA Times, which stated editorially, “It’s tempting to hope that the court will rule that states aren’t bound by the Second Amendment,” but continued, “Allowing the states and cities to ignore this part of the Bill of Rights could undermine the requirement that they abide by others… this is no time for the Court to start picking and choosing when it comes to the Bill of Rights.”

Bloomfield Press joins 34 California DAs, eight Nevada DAs, former Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack (the hero of the successful Brady-bill case that set 10th Amendment limits on federal invasion of states’ rights), several law-enforcement associations, and citizens’ rights groups in Arizona, California, Texas and Virginia in the amicus filing. Mr. Korwin’s extensive research and material appears throughout the brief, drafted by California attorney Chuck Michel of Michel and Associates.

The main points argued include:

http://www.gunlaws.com/supreme.htm

1) The right of the people to keep and bear arms is a deeply rooted “fundamental right” and thus properly applied to the states;

2) The Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment necessarily incorporates the Second Amendment to apply against the states;

3) The right to armed self defense is a fundamental right recognized repeatedly by the Supreme Court dating back to the 19th century;

4) The right to self defense, in addition to the right to arms, has been well established as fundamental for centuries in state constitutions, and in federal law and state law;

5) Firearms are and have always been recognized as essential to exercise the right to self defense, with each one reliant upon the other; and

6) Federalism (states rights) presents no obstacle to incorporating a fundamental right of the people.

The entire brief may be downloaded here
(it will be on the Supreme Court website shortly).

http://www.gunlaws.com/supreme.htm

——–

The 14th Amendment, Section 1: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

The amici include the Arizona Citizens Defense League (AzCDL), The Texas Concealed Handgun Association (TCHA), and The Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL), all easily googled. The complete list of amici with descriptions of their interests are in the brief. http://www.gunlaws.com/supreme.htm

——–

[Don’t forget Bill Of Rights Day, Dec. 15, at the Wrigley Mansion
[RSVP now or miss out: bor-day@gunlaws.com?subject=BOR-RSVP

Call, write, fax or click for new, free, full-color catalog,
released Nov. 2009. Include your mailing address.

——–

28th Amendment, Proposed:
“Congress shall make no law that applies to citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to Senators or Representatives, and Congress shall make no law that applies to Senators or Representatives that does not apply equally to citizens of the United States.”

Brand new 24th edition of The Arizona Gun Owner’s Guide (Restaurant Carry Law, Parking-Lot Law, Defensive Display, CCW changes, Self-Defense changes, much more). http://www.gunlaws.com/books.htm

Alan Korwin
Bloomfield Press
“We publish the gun laws.”
4848 E. Cactus, #505-440
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
602-996-4020 Phone
602-494-0679 Fax
1-800-707-4020 Orders

http://www.gunlaws.com

alan@gunlaws.com
Call, write, fax or click for free full-color catalog
(This is our address and info as of Jan. 1, 2007)

If you can read this, thank a teacher.
If you’re reading this in English, thank a veteran.

“No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing
because he could do only a little.”
–Edmund Burke

Encourage politicians to pass more laws…
with expiration dates.

Borrowing that slogan from the astonishing popular TV series “The X Files” it was just a matter of time before the alternative media would make a breakthrough among Obama’s disciples. Young people were his most hardcore supporters until Dick Morris’ efforts to expose the fine print included in the health care package struck paydirt. The under 30 crowd now realize how costly the bill actually will become for their demographic group. Good work, Dick. Read complete article below:

THE YOUNG TURN AGAINST OBAMACARE

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

Published on DickMorris.com on November 24, 2009

Previously, we reported to you that our national polling showed that the under-30 voters were the strongest supporters of the Obama healthcare initiative. While seniors opposed it by almost 2-to-1 and voters 30-64 opposed it by five- to 10-point margins, the under-30 voters backed his program by 58-30.

So with the funds you have donated, we ran television advertisments and an Internet campaign aimed at young people focused in Arkansas, North Dakota and Maine. The results are incredible! Now under-30 voters are the strongest opponents of the plan. In the table below, we show you the vote on the Obama plan broken down by age. (We aggregated all three states so we would have enough interviews to make the age subsets statistically meaningful.)

Support/Oppose Obama plan, combined data for Arkansas, North Dakota and Maine

Age Support/Oppose Obama Plan

Under 30 25-65

30-49 28-60

50-64 41-50

Over 65 32-55

The polling had predicted that the young would swing sharply and dramatically against the Obama program once they got the key information about it, but we are blown away by these results.

These data are from polls the League of American Voters commissioned John Zogby to conduct. Commenting on the results, John said, “These results among 18- to 29-year-olds are striking. It puts in jeopardy the whole theory of the new Democratic majority, because young people are essential to that base.”

Boy, is he ever correct!

At the same time that we are seeing this big shift, the national data on ObamaCare continues to show slippage. Rasmussen shows support down to 38 percent (56 percent opposed) from 45-52 right after the House vote.

Will the Senate listen to public opinion? Damn right they will! At this rate, they would have to face the loss of their entire political base to pass this legislation. Politicians don’t work that way! These early procedural votes don’t mean much. As George W. Bush said in the war on terror, “We have to be right all the time. The enemy just has to get it right once.” Now it is the opposite. We just need to win one vote to kill the plan. They need to win them all. And at this rate, the plan is in deep, deep trouble.

PLEASE keep the money flowing! We want to run ads along this line in all the swing states (Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Maine, Indiana, Virginia, Connecticut). To do so for the three weeks before the Senate vote will cost us $1.3 million.

CLICK HERE to see the ad and to donate to keep it running!

https://www.newsmaxstore.com/contribute/lav/

Glenn Beck Actively Recruiting: Find Out Details

http://w3.newsmax.com/a/oct09/index.cfm?PROMO_CODE=91DF-1

Your Tiny Thyroid Linked to Obesity, Heart and 49 Other Diseases

http://w3.newsmax.com/newsletters/brownstein/thyroid2.cfm?PROMO_CODE=91E2-1

Sarah Palin’s New Book, Incredible Free Offer

http://w3.newsmax.com/a/sarahbook/?s=al&promo_code=91E0-1

Go to DickMorris.com to read all of Dick’s columns!
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO FRIENDS AND FAMILY AND TELL THEM THEY CAN GET THESE COLUMNS E-MAILED TO THEM FOR FREE BY SUBSCRIBING AT DICKMORRIS.COM!

THANK YOU!

***COPYRIGHT EILEEN MCGANN AND DICK MORRIS 2009. REPRINTS WITH PERMISSION ONLY***

How can anyone deny that rationed medical care will be imposed on America when you compare and factor in the book written by former South Dakota Senator Tom Daschle [http://reason.com/archives/2008/12/23/tom-daschles-plan-for-health-c], White House chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel’s brother Dr. Eziekiel Emanuel’s screed against the Hippocratic Oath [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203706604574374463280098676.html], and the recent suggestion by the Health and Human Services Department’s U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that women under 50 should be persuaded not to have a mammography? These are the key pieces of the health puzzle. It all fits, doesn’t it?

You might find the views of Cass Sunstein [Obama's regulatory czar] quite unsettling as well as chilling. Perhaps George Orwell was more prohetic than we give him credit for. But our president has indeed surrounded himself with extremists whose agenda is to radically change America in their own socialist image.Click here for alarming story.

Remember the cartoon Tweety Bird and his eternal nemesis the cat? And when Tweety would lay a trap to trip the cat he’d say “Poor little putty tat he fall down?” Well, poor President Obama is tripping over his own self-inflicted traps by assuming that his own charisma and servile, oops, I meant “apologetic and nice guy” demeanor would win the hearts and minds of our enemies and we would then live happily and peacefully thereafter. In his dreams, perhaps but not in the real world.

Right now Obama is an impotent leader who is seen as a joke by our enemies. They no longer fear us based on our president having telegraphed his reluctance to use military force. A case in point is his indecisveness regarding sending additional troops to Afghanistan. I guarantee you that our enemies are watching carefully and taking notes.
Again, elections have consequences and you get the president you deserve.Click here for more.